Comments on: Testing methods that depend upon a singleton class http://blog.somecreativity.com/2008/12/11/testing-methods-that-depend-upon-a-singleton-class/ Weblog of Siddharth Uppal Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:37:06 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: yvangelist http://blog.somecreativity.com/2008/12/11/testing-methods-that-depend-upon-a-singleton-class/#comment-5185 Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:37:06 +0000 http://blog.somecreativity.com/?p=541#comment-5185 I don’t know if it was available back in VS 2008, but instead of creating a private accessor. I sign my assembly with [assembly:InternalsVisibleTo("MyTestAssembly"]. I find that this creates less “noise” and impacts less the test project.

]]> By: DSLR-A900 http://blog.somecreativity.com/2008/12/11/testing-methods-that-depend-upon-a-singleton-class/#comment-5184 Thu, 17 Nov 2011 21:12:53 +0000 http://blog.somecreativity.com/?p=541#comment-5184 Nos, ez az első nézd meg a blog! Mi vagyunk a csoport az önkéntesek és a kezdő egy teljesen új kezdeményezés, hogy egy regionális közösség pontosan ugyanazon niche. A blog szolgáltatott számunkra értékes információt dolgozni. Tettél egy csodálatos feladat!

]]> By: Derek Hammer http://blog.somecreativity.com/2008/12/11/testing-methods-that-depend-upon-a-singleton-class/#comment-4769 Sat, 09 May 2009 03:22:44 +0000 http://blog.somecreativity.com/?p=541#comment-4769 Really good article! Nice, clear and concise description of how to test Singletons.

Personally, I use reflection instead of the Accessor assembly. It’s essentially the same; just different points of entry. I do it because I think reflection is cool and because other languages that I’ve programmed in would need reflection to do a similar singleton test (to my knowledge, _Accessor assembly is unique to .NET platform)

Thanks for the great article, though!

]]>